Skip to content

Who Owns the Stars? Creating a Space Opera Universe

16
Share

Who Owns the Stars? Creating a Space Opera Universe

Home / Who Owns the Stars? Creating a Space Opera Universe
Books writing

Who Owns the Stars? Creating a Space Opera Universe

By

Published on February 8, 2017

16
Share

Authors make stuff up. Let’s not pretend it’s any more magical than that. It’s when we’re called out for populating those made-up worlds in ways that reveal our assumptions about that future that we get uncomfortable admitting that on the page, we rule absolute. So we hand-wave and sputter about how the characters led the way, about how we were being “realistic,” about common tropes and what came before…

But when we choose who goes into to space, who populates the future, we are doing just that: exercising a choice. And I wanted to see a choice I hadn’t seen before.

So I wrote it.

Sometime in 2013, I crowdsourced a booklist on Twitter. I wanted to know how many science fiction books people could think of that didn’t feature a single character that could be categorized as biologically male. Not just worlds where the only sexual organs people had were wombs and vaginas, but worlds where any other type of sexual organs simply weren’t mentioned or even conceived of. I wanted to see if there was a novel where the idea we roll around as being “male” didn’t show up at all and wasn’t mentioned—not as observers, or some extinct idea. The world could have multiple genders, sure, but not ones tied to genitals like some folks still insist on here (which suffers from many problems, among them being there is no hard and fast “rule” for what being “biologically” one sex or another is. I’m using these terms in the broadest way possible in this article with the understanding that they are flawed); everyone would have the same set.

You might think that’s a weird ask, to find books like that, but consider this: science fiction and fantasy is all about imagining worlds where anything is possible. It’s about building fantastic spaces and cultures and making things that are really different. In Ursula Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness, she imagined a world where folks shift biological sex throughout their lives. In Nicola Griffith’s Ammonite, she created a world of women who were able to propagate through parthenogenesis. Storm Constantine created a world where men transform into hermaphrodites and most women die off in Wraeththu.

So, when you see a world that hasn’t been built, it behooves you to ask yourself: why? And then, immediately—why not?

My new space opera, The Stars are Legion, started with the idea of how we would navigate through deep space on the extraordinary timelines required to travel between galaxies. The idea of creating organic world-ships that could grow and reproduce was not a new idea, but the idea to populate them exclusively with people who had wombs was, I believe, a first. Certainly, this began as a very practical idea. How did the ship create the parts it needed? What if women birthed them? It was space opera womb-punk of the best kind.

People giving birth to objects other than children also isn’t revolutionary—I’m thinking of David Brin’s “Peicework”, and Geoff Ryman’s Air, as well as Christopher Priest’s short fiction about the Dream Archipelago.

What makes a book unique isn’t always about having one big grand new idea. It’s about combining many different ideas in new and interesting ways. I created a legion of living starships populated by people who gave birth to the things it needs. How this arrangement originally came to be isn’t explored in the text, but one can see an empowering version and a horrifying version of how this may have played out. I enjoy the idea of the empowering one, where a group of women from different worlds decided they wanted to see another galaxy, and knew the only way to do it was to literally power the ships to get them there with their own labor. But there could certainly be many interpretations of how this system came to be. I’m the sort of writer who likes to leave doors open for readers.

stars-legionI’ve gotten lots of questions about how women would organize themselves, how women would lead, how women would blah blah blah when creating this system of starships, as if these women having uteruses would intrinsically change everything about their humanity. How can women be militant? How can they be politically conniving? How can they get bogged down in a war over resources? To which I respond, well, do you know any women in real life? Because, like, humans, uh, do things.

In the case of building the society of The Stars are Legion, what was most important was figuring out how a society would run in which birth and pregnancy were considered so much intrinsically part of the human experience (say what you will, but it’s still shuttered up and backburnered here as an aberrant state, hence the fight to get healthcare protections for those who get pregnant and give birth). Figuring out how these people chose to control their fertility, and what value they placed on it, and how it affected their views on life, how they were all connected but still at war, was the most interesting part of the thought exercise, for me.

As readers, and creators, the best part of what we do is challenging the expectations we bring to our experience of reading or writing a work. I enjoy challenging myself in new and different ways. I want to push forward, dive deep, and see a world that’s really different. A writing instructor once told me that a story of mine suffered from a “failure of imagination.” I don’t know about y’all, but that’s pretty much the worst thing a speculative fiction writer can fail at. So I push harder. I go where others don’t. I make the worlds I’ve never seen.

Kameron Hurley is the author of the essay collection The Geek Feminist Revolution, as well as the award-winning God’s War Trilogy and The Worldbreaker Saga. Hurley has won the Hugo Award, Kitschy Award, and Sydney J. Bounds Award for Best Newcomer. She was also a finalist for the Arthur C. Clarke Award, the Nebula Award, and the Gemmell Morningstar Award. Her short fiction has appeared in Popular Science Magazine, Lightspeed Magazine, and many anthologies. Hurley has also written for The Atlantic, Entertainment Weekly, The Village Voice, Bitch Magazine, and Locus Magazine. Her latest novel, The Stars are Legion, is available from Saga Press.

About the Author

Kameron Hurley

Author

Kameron Hurley is the author of the novels God’s War, Infidel, and Rapture a science-fantasy noir series which earned her the Sydney J. Bounds Award for Best Newcomer and the Kitschies Award for Best Debut Novel. She has won the Hugo Award (twice), and been a finalist for the Nebula Award, the Clarke Award, the Locus Award, and the BSFA Award for Best Novel. Her most recent novel is the epic fantasy The Mirror Empire. The sequel, Empire Ascendant, will be out in October 2015. She writes regularly for Locus Magazine and publishes personal essays at kameronhurley.com.
Learn More About Kameron
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
Almuric
8 years ago

So, you’ve provided a rationale for sending women into space, but no explanation for why there’s no men. Are they genetically-engineered to produce only female offspring? Or are the males aborted?

Avatar
Quill
8 years ago

@1: There are a few species of lizards where all individuals are female. In a sci-fi future, there’s always a possibility of genetic manipulation, alternate universes where evolution went differently, etc. This is one of those things that has to fly under the radar in a sci-fi book where it’s not part of the plot, otherwise people expect it to be Checkov’s gun later on. (And something that might go 100% unremarked in a character’s consciousness if it is indeed normal in their society. So the lack of explanation could be due to narration, if the story is first person or third person limited in perspective.)

Avatar
8 years ago

@@@@@ Almuric

You wouldn’t need to genetically engineer to produce only female off-spring or to abort male foetuses, women are XX, in the absence of males (XY) they will naturally produce only females. Being female is the default state.

Avatar
8 years ago

@1 I can’t tell if you’re being glib or genuinely curious. If it’s curiously, I’d encourage you to pick up the book and read. 

If you’re being dismissive of the very idea that a book can have no male characters, then know that it’s exactly that kind of thinking that led to this book being written. In a genre of literature that should be limitless, readers and writers of your ilk keep it so narrowly focused on the dominant perspective of white male that you destroy the potential that lies at the heart of science fiction.

Avatar
WarwickTheWild
8 years ago

The idea of creating organic world-ships that could grow and reproduce was not a new idea

How is that supposed to work? If they’re in deep space, they’ve got no new biomass or nutrients with which to grow and reproduce, and they’re exposed to searing radiation and hard vacuum that should be seriously bad news for the organic matter they’ve already got.

Avatar
TheMadLibrarian
8 years ago

WarwickTheWild, despite there not being a lot out in the deep dark, you can still scoop up interstellar matter (see Bussard Ramjet) to fuel things, as well as vanishingly rare asteroids.  If you have fusion, you can create a lot of the elements you need.  Radiation is difficult to deal with but not insurmountable, and vacuum we’ve been working with for decades.

Avatar
Almuric
8 years ago

“@1 I can’t tell if you’re being glib or genuinely curious. If it’s curiously, I’d encourage you to pick up the book and read. 
If you’re being dismissive of the very idea that a book can have no male characters, then know that it’s exactly that kind of thinking that led to this book being written.”

No, just curious. My beef with single-gender baseline human societies is that they have a very obvious point of breakage. If you lose your tech, you’ll go extinct.

Avatar
8 years ago

@5.Warwick

I’m only about ten or so chapters in, but the question you’re asking is being addressed in the story.

Avatar
Almuric
8 years ago

Another question that pops to mind: if their biotech level is such that they can engineer humans to produce starship parts, why couldn’t they create artificial wombs that could do the same thing?

Avatar
WarwickTheWild
8 years ago

This is true, but it raises the question of why? A living ship is going to be less robust than one made of metals, and the self-repairing aspect of a living organism isn’t much of an upside given a) it’s going to be taking more damage than a mechanical one in the first place b) organisms tend to not heal injuries to 100%, and more severe injuries will be permanently crippling (whereas on a mechanical one can be repaired from any damage that doesn’t completely destroy the ship). Not to mention the issues you’re liable to have with things like organic power conduits, radiation shielding for the crew, etc…

 

I mean, obviously the real answer is that it’s a work of fiction and symbolism and I should just relax, but organic spaceships are one of those things I have a bug up my ass about.

Avatar
8 years ago

@@@@@ Almuric “Another question that pops to mind: if their biotech level is such that they can engineer humans to produce starship parts, why couldn’t they create artificial wombs that could do the same thing?”

 

I don’t know why in the book, but you already have a reasonably effiicient reproductive system which nurtures foetuses that are essentially self-programmed, all the uterus does is provide nutrients and a protected environment so why reinvent the wheel? If you put in a zygote with different programming you could get something other than a baby at the end. Obviously there are things that would need to be tweaked, but if you have humans that have already been genetically engineered to do this the system would be self-perpetuating, you’d just need to vary what got implanted according to what was needed. On a small scale this is already done with some very rare animals, zygotes can be put into females of a closely related species and successfully brought to term so increasing the number of the species at a faster rate than can be done just using the remaining females. There are people who want to recreate mammoths by putting artificially created mammoth zygotes into elephants and it’s not totally science fiction.

Avatar
Almuric
8 years ago

@11. You would reinvent the wheel if possible to spare women being used as factories.

Avatar
8 years ago

Sounds interesting.  In my youth, I certainly read more than one book that contained only male characters; naval adventures and the like.  But there was always that world off to the side where procreation took place, and the human race was perpetuated.

Avatar
Valentin D. Ivanov
8 years ago

Very intriguing.

Years ago I got a story out in the German magazine Internova with a similar premise – “technological” objects were modified fetuses and were given birth, not manufactured. I am not saying this to establish priority but to compare ideas. Because what I saw in this new technology – perhaps, very predictably – was another way to exploit people: I had three women strssed at a job interview with for a position with a big biotech corporation. It might have been three men during the gold rush, trying to sell the gold they have found that were being cheated by the gold trader – it would have been the same.

In other words, my story and this novel seem to represent the distopian and the utopian view on the same technology. I am sure you see why I am interested.

However, I think it is not the technology that sets people free or enslaves them, the other people do. There is something here from the Tomorrowland – they did build an Utopia, but it turned bad; was it because the people are intrinsically bad or for another reason? To me this was the biggest unaddressed question in the movie. BTW, A&B Strugatsky spend the entire second half of their work trying to answer that.

Anyway, I don’t know yet if I will agree with the idea of the book – probably not, because I have seen in person how the Utopais build on a single idea fail and I suspect it doesn’t matter is the idea is political, technological or related to gender – but the book seems to have an idea, which is a lot in the this age of the gastronomical SF&F that only “discusses” who is going to eat whom.

Bonnie McDaniel
Bonnie McDaniel
8 years ago

Having just finished the book, my take on it is this (trying not to be too spoilery): Remember the humans we’re talking about here are NOT the human beings of today. They’ve been evolving in symbiosis with the worldships for thousands of years, and the endpoint of that evolution means that males are not needed for reproduction any longer. Therefore, evolution being what it is, males have simply died out. Since the idea of a “male” is never mentioned in the story, we can surmise this happened so long ago the characters are unaware that a creature such as a male ever existed. 

That’s my headcanon, anyway. :) (By the way, this book is effing fantastic. PLEASE do yourself a favor and read it.)

Avatar
Valentin D. Ivanov
8 years ago

So, the book certainly has the feminist ideas, but the hype about this did it a miss-favour, because it also contains an interesting concept about the … let’s call it post-human evolution which remained unnoticed in the heated discussions. From the classics Slan by van Vogt comes to mind as a good comparison. I also like the writing style. Thanks!

PS I will try to write a bit more some day when I find the time.